If a defendant commits a killing during an alleged robbery, but is found not guilty of the robbery, can he be guilty of felony murder based on the robbery?

Study for the MBE Critical Pass Test. Enhance your knowledge with flashcards and multiple choice questions. Prepare thoroughly for your exam with detailed hints and explanations.

Multiple Choice

If a defendant commits a killing during an alleged robbery, but is found not guilty of the robbery, can he be guilty of felony murder based on the robbery?

Explanation:
Felony murder hinges on the defendant committing a felony at the time a death occurs. The underlying felony is an essential element of the offense; you must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant actually committed that felony. If the defendant is found not guilty of the robbery, there’s no proven underlying felony to base a felony-murder conviction on. Without proof of the felony, the felony-murder charge cannot stand. So the rule is that guilt of the underlying felony is necessary for a felony-murder conviction. The other ideas don’t fit: guilt to kill isn’t required by felony murder, and the theory doesn’t bypass proving the felonious act.

Felony murder hinges on the defendant committing a felony at the time a death occurs. The underlying felony is an essential element of the offense; you must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant actually committed that felony. If the defendant is found not guilty of the robbery, there’s no proven underlying felony to base a felony-murder conviction on. Without proof of the felony, the felony-murder charge cannot stand.

So the rule is that guilt of the underlying felony is necessary for a felony-murder conviction. The other ideas don’t fit: guilt to kill isn’t required by felony murder, and the theory doesn’t bypass proving the felonious act.